The "Problem of the Homeless" – Or, How We Learned to Hate the Poor (and Ignore the Obvious Solution)

By Leung Mi 2021 - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=113937230

Framing Homelessness as a Housing Problem, Not a People Problem

Let’s start with a crucial correction. It’s not “the problem of the homeless.” It’s homelessness. The problem isn’t people; it’s the condition of being without a home. It’s a semantic point, perhaps, but a vital one. Because when we talk about “the problem of the homeless,” it subtly shifts the blame, the focus, the… disgust, onto the individuals themselves, rather than on the societal failure that creates and perpetuates homelessness. So, let’s get it straight: the problem is homelessness. And the solution? Well, the word itself practically screams it at you: homes. It’s almost insultingly obvious, isn’t it? How to solve the problem of homelessness? Provide… homes! We’ve already talked, at length, about the broader housing crisis, the affordability crunch squeezing millions. But homelessness is a specific, particularly brutal manifestation of that crisis, and one that has been festering in America for decades, if not centuries. And in the wealthiest society that has ever existed, the spectacle of widespread homelessness is not just an irony, it’s a moral indictment. America, more than any nation in history, possesses the resources, the wealth, the sheer capacity to easily, demonstrably, end homelessness. We could build tenement housing, we could subsidize rents, we could unleash construction subsidies, we could build it ourselves, we could incentivize private industry – the toolbox of solutions is overflowing. And yet… we mostly stand by and… do what, exactly?

The Great American Zoning Rip-Off: How Land Use Laws Keep Housing Prices Sky-High (and Who Really Benefits)

The Housing Crisis and the Zoning Culprit

Housing. Just the word can induce a cold sweat in anyone under the age of 45 these days, especially if you live in… well, pretty much any American city with actual jobs. Sky-high rents, bidding wars for shoebox-sized apartments, the crushing realization that homeownership is now a generational fantasy for many. We’re in a full-blown housing crisis, folks. And while there are many contributing factors – stagnant wages, predatory investors, the rise of avocado toast consumption (kidding… mostly) – there’s one often-overlooked villain lurking in the shadows, silently pulling the strings of unaffordability: zoning laws. Yes, zoning. Sounds boring, right? Like something only beige-suit-wearing bureaucrats get excited about. But trust me, these seemingly innocuous land use restrictions are actually powerful levers shaping our cities, our economies, and our levels of societal inequality. And they’re a major reason why you’re probably staring down the barrel of another rent increase right now. Let’s pull back the curtain on the great American zoning rip-off and expose how these seemingly technical rules are keeping housing prices sky-high (and, crucially, who really benefits).

The Car as 'Freedom': But Not the Kind of Freedom You Were Thinking Of... (Spoiler: It's Debt)

The Automotive "Freedom" Pitch vs. Reality

“Freedom!” That’s the word they use, isn’t it? The siren song of the automobile. “The open road awaits! Feel the wind in your hair!” (assuming you can afford the convertible upgrade and also enjoy the sensation of small rocks pelting your face). “Nothing to hold you back!” Except, you know, car payments. And insurance premiums that can rival those car payments, especially if you’re unlucky enough to be young or, heaven forbid, male. And maintenance costs that mysteriously balloon right after the warranty expires, because of course they do. But after all that glorious financial preamble, then we’re ready for our freedom! Right? Vroom vroom! Let’s hit the… wait. Where are we going? And more importantly… where will we park? And how much will that little slice of asphalt nirvana cost us? And… did we remember where we parked? Because finding it later might require a minor archeological expedition. The automobile proposes to offer freedom, no doubt. But the more you think about it, the more you realize this “freedom” is a peculiar beast indeed, a strange and expensive liberation that seems to come with an awfully long list of… obligations.

The MPO Mystery: Who Really Runs Your Region? (And Should We Be Asking?)

The Invisible Hand of Regional Planning

Ever wondered who really shapes the future of your region? Who decides where the new highways go, where the transit lines might extend, how federal infrastructure dollars get spent across sprawling metropolitan areas? Chances are, you haven't heard of them. Meet the Metropolitan Planning Organization, or MPO. These somewhat obscure entities are responsible for regional-level planning in pretty much every major metropolitan area across the US. Think of them as the invisible hand guiding the development of entire regions, especially in areas where city boundaries blur and multiple municipalities sprawl across a shared economic and geographic space. MPOs are tasked with tackling regional challenges that transcend city or county lines – transportation, economic development, environmental planning – all the big-picture stuff that shapes our daily lives and the economic fortunes of our region. They wield enormous influence over the direction of regional growth, impacting everything from commute times to housing patterns to job access. But here’s the rub, the question that’s been nagging at me lately: who are these MPOs, really? And are they… democratically accountable to the people whose lives they so profoundly affect? Because, spoiler alert: the answer might be… complicated, and maybe even a little bit unsettling.

Bulldozing Paradise: Why Le Corbusier's Urban Dreams Became Our Urban Nightmares

By Limongi - originally uploaded to :en at en:File:Monumental axis.jpg, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5921507

The Specter of Plan Voisin and the Modernist Menace

Ah, Le Corbusier. Just the name conjures up images of… well, depending on your urban planning sensibilities, either gleaming white towers of modernist aspiration or soul-crushing concrete slabs of dystopian despair. Let’s be honest, for many of us in the “lived experience” trenches of modern cities, it’s often the latter. And to truly grasp the sheer, unadulterated audacity of Le Corbusier, one need only conjure up Plan Voisin: his little weekend project to, oh, you know, just bulldoze most of historic Paris and replace it with a grid of identical, gleaming skyscrapers set in… parks. Paris! Destroyed! Replaced with… that? Who was this joker? All joking aside (though, frankly, the temptation to relentlessly mock is strong), Le Corbusier was, undeniably, a hugely influential figure in 20th-century urban planning. He popularized the “tower in a park” concept, penned the urban planning manifesto “The Radiant City,” and left an architectural and planning legacy that, to put it mildly, is… complicated. While his intentions were, perhaps, noble (efficiency! hygiene! order!), the practical outcomes of his modernist vision have often been, well, urban planning nightmares. Let’s delve into why Le Corbusier’s “urban dreams” so often became our urban realities, and why, in many ways, we’re still grappling with the consequences.

Unlock Downtown: From Office Park to Neighborhood – Reimagining the Heart of the City

The Daytime Downtown Dilemma

Gaze upon the American downtown skyline. Majestic office towers pierce the sky, monuments to commerce and industry. But stroll those downtown streets after 6 pm, especially outside of a precious few urban meccas like New York or San Francisco, and you’ll often find… crickets. Vast stretches of parking lots shimmer under sodium lights. Perhaps a few lonely condo towers stand sentinel, often perched atop their own multi-story parking garages, feeling oddly… suburban, despite their urban address. For all their supposed centrality, many American downtowns feel strangely isolated, daytime-only zones, places to work, not to live. They’re seldom, if ever, thought of as neighborhoods. But should they be? Could they be? Because beneath the glassy facades and concrete canyons lies an enormous, often untapped potential: the potential to transform these sterile office parks into vibrant, vital, and legitimate neighborhoods, the true heart of the city, day and night. Let’s unlock downtown, shall we?

Reclaiming the Dream: The Real American Dream, and Why Cynicism Misses the Point

By Bachrach/Globe archives - Original publication: boston globeImmediate source: https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2015/04/16/what-man-behind-american-dream-really-meant/uni438RcM82Y3QDnkwRz5H/story.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=46455705

Confessing Cynicism and the "Madison Avenue" Dream

Okay, confession time. I’m a cynic. There, I said it. For a long time, one of my prime targets for cynical side-eye has been the “American Dream.” Because, let’s be honest, the version of the American Dream that’s been relentlessly marketed to us for decades feels… well, a bit hollow, doesn’t it? The house in the suburbs, the two cars in the driveway, the perfectly manicured lawn, the 2.5 kids (where does that half-kid even live?). It all smacks of… Madison Avenue, doesn’t it? Like some cleverly crafted ad campaign designed to sell us more stuff, convincing us that happiness comes pre-packaged in a suburban box, and that “success” is measured in square footage and horsepower. For years, I’ve just shrugged it off as vapid consumerism masquerading as national aspiration, a dusty relic of the postwar boom, utterly irrelevant to the complexities of the 21st century. But then… I did a little digging. And I stumbled upon something that made even my cynical heart do a double-take.